Monthly Archives: May 2016

Quentin Kopp Jokes

Title: Quentin Kopp Jokes

Informant Info: Mene Ukueberuwa is an Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of The Dartmouth Review. He is a ’16 (formerly ’14) from Princeton, NJ. He was interviewed on May 12, 2016 at the Collis Center in Hanover, NH.

Type of Lore: Verbal, Joke

Language: English

Country of Origin: United States

Social / Cultural Context: The Review has some eccentric subscribers. Some of the mail sent by these subscribers have now become jokes that are often repeated within the organization.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuYUjVJVsMc&feature=youtu.be

Transcript:

Very true. We have definitely some eccentric subscribers who like to send us letters to the editor, comments, criticism, things like that.  So one of the more famous is a fellow named Quentin Kopp, class of ‘49, so getting up there in years, and he’s a very careful reader of the paper, so he sent us some letters criticizing our use of language, I remember one of our staffers named Charles Jang coined the term “studentry” to refer to the student body, and Quentin Kopp sent him an angry letter telling to “shape up.”  Most recently, Mr. Kopp sent us a letter pointing out that some of the people listed on our advisory board in the paper have passed and asking us to update that, but he also was under the false impression that one of our students, a freshman, had passed, and asked us “Is Max Frankel alive?”, which made us all kind of scratch our heads, we made sure to check on him to see if he indeed was, but it was a good thing that he was safe and sound.

Is Max Frankel alive?

Is Max Frankel alive?

Collector’s Comments: “Is Max Frankel alive?” is now a joke often repeated within the organization. “Shape up!” is also a common expression used in an ironic and joking way at the Review. These jokes bring the organization together and also help bridge the gap with alumni who may be from another generation.

Marine Corps Marching Cadence

Title: Marine Corps Marching Cadence

Informant info: Craig Serpa, marine. He was stationed in San Diego.

Type of lore: Customary, Ritual

Language: English

Country of Origin: USA

Social / Cultural Context: Craig Serpa was interviewed at Dartmouth College. Craig sent me a video of this after our interview via text. He believed it was a good example of a marching cadence.

Associated file: https://youtu.be/88QzxcPtZXo 

Transcript:

Informant’s comments: Craig was a drill instructor, and often ran this ritual himself.

Collector’s comments: Informant remembered this cadence afterward, and wanted to show me a video of it. It was very interesting to visually see it, rather than talk about it.

Bureaucracy

Title: Bureaucracy

Informant Info: Mene Ukueberuwa is an Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of The Dartmouth Review. He is a ’16 (formerly ’14) from Princeton, NJ. He was interviewed on May 12, 2016 at the Collis Center in Hanover, NH.

Type of Lore: Verbal, Joke

Language: English

Country of Origin: United States

Social / Cultural Context: The concept of government (or college) bureaucracy tends to be an easy target of ridicule for conservative or libertarian-minded students. This genre of jokes is a lighthearted and humorous expression of philosophical ideals.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImLbRk2Upuk&feature=youtu.be

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uV_uepwlEs&feature=youtu.be

Transcript:

Yeah, one is kind of just poking fun at the overgrown bureaucracy within the College. The Dartmouth Review is very much a very anti-bureaucratic organization ourselves.  We like to kind of just take things as they come, and obviously it’s become a huge problem for the College to have these massively bloated staff, and so we always like to poke fun at the titles like “The Vice Provost of Student Affairs” and things like that, by sort of designing overblown titles for ourselves and suggesting that we add them to the masthead, so things like “The Uber-Vice-President for Internal Management Affairs of the Review,” things like that … This same guy, Vice President of the Dartmouth Review, another way, another way that we kind of poke fun at bureaucracy is that whenever someone has a purchase they want to make or a change they want to make, we always ask them to write up a full proposal just so that he can make sure we can properly gauge the environmental impact of the actions, and things like that.  Not only poking fun at bureaucracy, but also poking fun at the oversensitive environment and a lot of the sort of tendencies of people we tend to disagree with.

Proposed bureaucracy of the Review ... needs an environmental impact statement!

Proposed bureaucracy of the Review … needs an environmental impact statement!

Collector’s Comments: This genre of bureaucracy-related jokes has become quite prolific within the Review. A related genre of jokes (which was heard but not formally collected), relates to surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA).

Defending Her Honor

Title: Defending Her Honor

Informant Info: Mene Ukueberuwa is an Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of The Dartmouth Review. He is a ’16 (formerly ’14) from Princeton, NJ. He was interviewed on May 12, 2016 at the Collis Center in Hanover, NH.

Type of Lore: Verbal, Legend

Language: English

Country of Origin: United States

Social / Cultural Context: The use of the phrase “defending her honor” harkens back to chivalry, demonstrating how the Review tends to be a traditional organization. It also references the social scene at Dartmouth, which consists mostly of fraternities where some people may be a bit too aggressive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soozoIT0Mrw&feature=youtu.be

Transcript:

So, if you hang around the Review office enough, you will be likely to hear the phrase, “He was defending her honor,” pop up in random conversations, and that all goes back to an incident that occurred my freshman year with a fellow former ‘14 who was involved in an altercation on Frat Row. He was with a friend of his, and she got into a little bit of a dispute with an aggressive fellow freshman, and then this staffer courageously stepped in to save her from this advance; ended up in a little bit of a scuffle, that had some bad repercussions for both of the people involved, but he came out of it very proud to have defended her honor, and that was always the only thing that he would tell people when they asked him, exactly why it was that he ended up in the sticky situation he was in. So we always like to repeat the phrase, kind of as a tribute to him.

Collector’s Comments: The actual details of the incident, which happened in 2010, are unclear. Regardless of what actually happened, this legend is one of the most popular within the Review. New staffers are usually exposed to it at an early time, and it has evolved to the point where the phrase “defending her honor” is almost ubiquitous within the organization.

Hey Josephine

Hey Josephine

Informant info: Craig Serpa, marine. He was stationed in San Diego.

Type of lore: Customary, Music

Language: English

Country of Origin: USA

Social / Cultural Context: Craig Serpa was interviewed at Dartmouth College. Craig was asked about any folk songs that he remembered singing during training or being stationed at base camp. Craig was a drill instructor, so he remembered many. I asked him to talk about they they sang.

Associated file: 

Transcript:

C: There’s, we have, so our cadence is something we are known for. I was a drill instructor so I made marines. You can look up on youtube a video of me singing cadence.

Interviewer: Oh just type in your name?

C: Yeah so just put, idk how long 5-6 min when I actually start singing and walking the group. Another thing that we do that I am sure that the army does too, I’m not sure, but instead of doing just regular walking cadence and stuff, a lot of runs are done with cadences, where we sing songs that tell funny stories. And then hiking. When you’re doing the long hikes and you have your packs on and everything, we have like hike specific songs that tell stories about being back home, and what happened like if I die tell my mom I did my best with my medals across my chest. And they do that I think just to keep your mind off the shit you’re going through. Like you have 80 lbs on your back, its been 3 days and you’ve slept an hour and a half, sing a song. And its like, if you have a good platoon lader, they like actually sing and get into it. It kinda gets you going. Really what I was told, the purpose of doing all of that—forces your to expand your lungs- It benefits you from hypervenhilating. It keeps you breathing in a rhythm.

Interviewer: Do you remember any of them? You probably remember all of them. Do you have your favorite song? You can speak it, you don’t have to sing it.

C: Probably Hey Josephine. 1st sg. Pharo when I was a drill instructor with bravo company. I’m not going to sing or anything, if you look up the legendary marine core drill instructure—there’s a cd with some of the more famous DI in the last 20-30 year. Actual cadence song. All of us use it and kinda memorize it and stuff and try to get all of the songs down. Some of them tell stories of WWI, Korea, Kayson, Bell Wood and all of that stuff

Informant’s comments: Craig told me that singing was something that helped them get through the hard times, which we often see in history. Craig said that men would buy the CD full of hiking songs so that they could memorize them. The songs never change from year to year.

Collector’s comments: Informant was nervous to sing, and refused to but he told me I could look up the song. He seemed very fond of the songs, and said he could remember every word.

2000 Word Essay

Title: 2000 Word Essay

Informant Info: Mene Ukueberuwa is an Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of The Dartmouth Review. He is a ’16 (formerly ’14) from Princeton, NJ. He was interviewed on May 12, 2016 at the Collis Center in Hanover, NH.

Type of Lore: Verbal, Legend

Language: English

Country of Origin: United States

Social / Cultural Context: The legend refers to an actual article submitted (and rejected) for publication in the Review. The contents of the article are reproduced below:

Deciding on Decision Points: A Review of Dubya’s Self-reflection on Life, God, and Country

Bush, George Herbert Walker. Decision Points. Crown Publishers.

There is no question in anyone’s mind, whether liberal or conservative, that President George Walker Bush has emerged after his eight remarkable years in the White House, as one of the most controversial yet pivotal leaders of our time, and certainly of the first decade of the Twenty First Century. And whether you love him or hate this two-term, 43rd President of our Republic, I cannot recommend strongly enough that before trying to assess the legacy of his truly monumental presidency, both Mr. Bush’s detractors (of which there admittedly are many on both the Left as well as on the Right), and his unflinching supporters, standing with him to the last, should take the time to read his book.

However, this recommendation comes with an important caveat: I maintain that those in either camp would be wise to do so with an open mind, or, at the very least, as objectively as possible. For just a moment, prospective readers should try to look beyond, if not temporarily disregard the relentlessly crucifying, and perhaps at times, unfairly vitriolic artillery barrage with which the media assaulted the man (with journalists such as Scott Horton for Harper’s Magazine calling him the “worst president ever” and the like) during his time in office. I say this not in any attempt to enshrine the former president upon a pedestal among Washington, Reagan, and Lincoln because of some secretive personal view that I harbor. I intend nothing of the sort, for I too, like so many Americans, have a number of misgivings about some of the policies implemented by his administration. Nor am I trying to support the far-left and their staunch Bush-bashing agenda by scaring potential readers away from a book that even arguably liberal-leaning news publications such as Newsweek admits puts forth a rather convincing argument in favor of a more positive retrospective view of his leadership. Heck! Even his predecessor Bill Clinton touted its publication, raving “Decision Points is well-written, and interesting from start to finish. I think people of all political stripes should read it.” Rather, I simply believe that the only way to make it a substantive and worthwhile read is to approach the work from a mindset that attempts to see Mr. Bush, his presidency, and the legacy he left on our nation from the unique perspective from none other than the man himself—attempting to understand the personal life experiences, convictions, and viewpoints that he would take with him to the Oval Office as well as some of the facts laid out before him when the former Commander-in-Chief, and him alone, would have to make the crucial and arduous decisions that would come to shape his presidency and our nation as a whole.

In other words, to comprehend in full our forty-third president, along with all his contentious decisions and why he made them, one must walk in his shoes, to truly be the man who, as Teddy Roosevelt so famously remarked in 1910, “is actually in the arena, … face marred by dust and sweat and blood,” as it is he and “not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or whether the doer of deeds could have done them better,” for, merely from the outside looking in, we civilians cannot comprehend the full extent of what was involved in the eleventh-hour choices that Mr. Bush had to make in times of national crisis—with all of the available intelligence and resources at his disposal laid out before him on the table. To paraphrase W’s response at a press conference to a reporter’s query as to why he took the monumental action, divisive to this day, of utilizing military force against Iraq despite the nonexistence of WMDs in which he countered to the asker that if instead he held the office of the commander-in-chief, given all of the present, undisclosed information available to him at the moment when he was forced, for the sake of the security of the American people and preservation of American values, then he would have made the exact same decision as the true occupier of the Oval Office standing defiantly at the podium. And it is Decision Points, which is divided into essentially fourteen different decisions that Bush considers most important leading up to and during his presidency—not Bob Woodward’s Bush at War, Richard A. Clarke’s Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror, or  Scott McClellan’s What Happened—that truly provides a fairly detailed, reasonable, and, as ex-President Clinton rather surprisingly but aptly put it, the account “will help you to understand better the forces that molded him, and the convictions that drove him to make those decisions, to do what he thought was right.”

Granted, though it reveals a number of rather surprising and telling details about Bush’s most memorable (although not always positive) life experiences, his book is not a tell-all, no-holds look behind the scenes into the deepest innards of the Bush Presidency. So if that’s what you were expecting to find you will be quite disappointed. Nor does Decision Points follow the chronological, birth-to-present progression typical of the memoir genre, for its author instead chose to break down and then categorize the most pivotal moments in his life into fourteen theme-based chapters, each focused on a central choice or group of related choices that he made in the course of the truly remarkable sixty-three years that he has under his Texan belt so far. Thus, Bush, in his engaging, non-chronologically-styled memoir, takes the now hackneyed, predictably organized presidential autobiography in a new and rather refreshing direction. But Mr. Bush, who decides to begin with discussing what he calls “one of the toughest decisions I ever made,” remarkably isn’t even referring to a choice that he made during his presidency, although he admits it is one that, without which, “none of the others that follow in this book would have been possible.” Thus, what he is referring to in his dramatically opening line wherein his wife poses the gravely serious but “simple question” that his wife poses to him, asking “[c]an you remember the last day you didn’t have a drink?” is the immense and widely-known struggle he encountered to overcome his alcoholism, for of course he confesses that, given his habitual personality, “I could not remember one.”  As such, in the course of this first chapter, which he appropriately titles “Quitting,” Mr. Bush confronts his former self in a phase of his life in which he was a wild and care-free, frat boy-esque party animal during his time at Yale and Harvard Business School (although he fails to go into as much detail as I and probably most other Dartmouth students would be interested in hearing), where he was a chain smoker and had several run-ins with the law, and then his religion and family-influenced path to finally getting serious, that led to him putting away the bottle and engaging in potpourri of stints in a variety of jobs before ultimately realizing his great passion for and skill with people and subsequently, the man’s true calling in the field of politics. The rest, as they say, is history.

Speaking of the topic of history and how leaders are seen through its eyes either with love or hate, I am reminded of the words of Winston Churchill when he famously remarked to Joseph Stalin and Franklin D. Roosevelt at the Tehran Conference in 1943 that ‘history will judge us kindly because I shall write that history.’ And, as such, only time will tell, and perhaps his writing this resolute and competent, if not plainly-written personal memoir will help (and it should) improve the legacy of (as it did other widely-despised past presidents at the time they left office (such as Ulysses S. Grant, Harry S. Truman, and Richard M. Nixon, to name just a few) America’s ‘Don’t Mess with Texas’ President, George Walker Bush.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-pK8pAfDP0&feature=youtu.be

Transcript:

That’s true.  We definitely have some wordy people and so once upon a time we were doing our book reviews here, and every staffer was able to pick a certain book that they wanted to cover or would pick one of their own, and so this guy decided to do a review of “Decision Points” by George W. Bush, and we were all excited to read it because the book had been a big splash, but when he turned it in it ended up being about one single run-on sentence for approximately five pages of the most flowery prose that any of us had ever read. We were all really glad to have read it, and it was hilarious, but it didn’t end up actually making it into print; there wasn’t too much we could do to edit it … It wasn’t exactly the most critical review. This guy has a strong personal affection for the Bush family and so it ended up being kind of a peon to his greatness.

Collector’s Comments: The amusement and entertainment value of this legend comes from hearing the legend recounted in the presence staffers who actually know the person who wrote the original article. They can certainly attest to this particular staffer’s larger-than-life personality that would make this legend plausible. While rather verbose at approximately 1300 words and overly deferential to President Bush, the actual article is by no means a 2000-word run-on sentence. As seen with other items in the legend genre of folklore, the characteristics of the original work have been exaggerated significantly over time.

Marine Core Birthday Ball Celebration

Marine Core Birthday Ball Celebration

Title: Birthday Ball Celebration

Informant info: Craig Serpa, marine. He was stationed in San Diego.

Type of lore: Customary, Ritual, Celebration

Language: English

Country of Origin: USA

Social / Cultural Context: Craig Serpa was interviewed at Dartmouth College. Craig was asked about any folklore or stories related to his training. He described what he thought of as folklore and then told me about the Marine Birthday Ball Celebration. Every year the Marine Core holds a ball in order to celebrate the birthday of the marine core. At every birthday, there is a cake cutting ceremony where the oldest marine and the youngest marine are honored by getting the first pieces of cake, which represents passing on tradition from the old to the new. The also play the commandants message.

Associated file:

Transcript:

Interviewer: Well now I have fun things to talk about. Did you hear any ghost stories, during training or while you were stationed. So its all about folklore—so any ghost stories related, or really any stories at all—legends, myths, related to your base camp or training experience.

C: So when I think of folklore, I think of passed down oral traditions. Mainly. The marine core actually, we have, a specific marine core order that deals with the marine core birthday. Nov 10, 1775—have a birthday ball celebration every year, and its, they, part of the actual military order is we have a cake cutting ceremony and then the oldest marine and the youngest marine are honored in the cake cutting ceremony where they present themselves the first piece of cake and its supposed to resemble the passing on of the traditions from the oldest to the youngest marine and there’s always—you play the commandants message—birthday message is played every year. And they do the reading of the 14th commandant marine core—general Lejeune? Reread his birthday message as part of the military order now every single year. So that’s a past tradition, oral tradition.

Ghost stories? I would say no.

Informant’s comments: Craig told me that a celebration happens around the world no matter where you are. He said that for most marines, most of their fondest memories happened at this ball.

Collector’s comments: Craig was very excited to tell me about this tradition. He said that this was his favorite event of the year.

Challenge Coins

Title: Challenge Coins

Informant info: Craig Serpa, marine. He was stationed in San Diego.

Type of lore: Customary, Game

Language: English

Country of Origin: USA

Social / Cultural Context: Craig Serpa was interviewed at Dartmouth College. Craig was asked about certain games that they had experienced during their time in the military. Craig described a drinking game often often played at bars on their base. Each military man/woman is given a coin that displays their battalion, company, etc. While at a bar, if someone presents you their coin, you must have yours within two steps of you or else you have to buy that person a beer. But, if you present your coin and it is of a higher rank than the initial coin, the first person has to  buy the second a beer.

Associated file:

Transcript:

Interviewer: Speaking of superstition, do/did you have any superstitions? I play softball and I’m so superstitious/well I used to play. I used to have so many superstitions. Or rituals? I guess they’re kind of enforced.

C: One thing I never really got into was the whole challenge coin thing. Did billy talk about that at all?

Interviewer: I don’t think so.

B: So, a lot of regular companies are doing it now, it started as a military tradition I believe where each battalion level has, or it doesn’t have to be level, but each has little coins. And it says like unit name, ahs emblem, you know how each has little emblems for stuff? Black horse is their battalion, 5th marines, stuff like that. And the thing behind is that you’re supposed to carry a coin on you and if you’re out drinking or whatever, and like you present your coin to somebody and if they don’t have one within two steps of them, then they have to buy you a drink. So if you present it, then some coins depending on where you got them or how high up you got them. So some people will present it to their general, they will have a general star on the back, um whoever has the higest ranking one has to buy.

Interviewer: Is this at bars nearby?

C: Pretty much, yeah, so like you know theyre a military person.

(Interviewer and informant talk)

Interviewer: So if you know, then you present it.

C: it’s a marine, military thing. I’m pretty sure army does. It’s a navy thing. Lets think, I never really did anything, or got into the challenge coin thing. I would think that the majority of things I should be talking about is being a drill instructor, because you’re creating a marine from the beginning.

Informant’s comments: Craig admitted that he did not like to partake in this game, although he did lose many a time.

Collector’s comments: Although Craig did not think the game was important, I thought it was very interesting. I am curious if this game is popular throughout all of the branches of the military.

 

Dartmouth Review Gala

Title: Dartmouth Review Gala

Informant Info: Brandon Gill is a President Emeritus of The Dartmouth Review. He is a ’16 from West Texas. He was interviewed on May 24, 2016 at the Review office in Hanover, NH.

Mene Ukueberuwa is an Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of The Dartmouth Review. He is a ’16 (formerly ’14) from Princeton, NJ. He was interviewed on May 12, 2016 at the Collis Center in Hanover, NH.

Type of Lore: Customary, Tradition

Language: English

Country of Origin: United States

Social / Cultural Context: The Review Gala is a formal, black tie event that takes place in New York City every five years. It has been a tradition of the Review since its founding and brings together alumni, donors, and current staffers to celebrate the continuation of the paper.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0EpZfgQ4mg&feature=youtu.be

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew3Yr1IK4js&feature=youtu.be

Transcript:

Mene:

Yeah, we’re about to celebrate our 35th Anniversary Gala, these are celebrations that we have every 5 years, in New York City at the Union League Club down there.  So, very similar to our changeover dinner in a sense, it’s kind of a formal gathering of current staffers and our advisory board, but we also like to invite the broader Dartmouth Review family, so lots of our subscribers and supporters are going to be around.  The keynote address at the event is given by one of  our most famous alumni, that’s Laura Ingraham from the Class of ‘85.  We are going to be honoring our founder, Jeffrey Hart, and the contributions that he’s made to the paper.  He was an English professor here at Dartmouth who was in instrumental in getting the Review off the ground.  And again, it’s just going to be a kind of festive, lively environment, to celebrate the culture of the paper, so we’re all looking forward to that.

Brandon:

Yes, so the last Gala was the 30th Anniversary Gala. We have a Gala every 5 years, to bring back Dartmouth Review alumni we met in NYC for the 30th Anniversary Gala, we had Mr. Andrew Breitbart give a keynote address, and it was full of staff members and lots of alumni, and afterwards a significant portion of the staff went out with Mr. Breitbart and barhopped throughout Manhattan until about 4:00 AM and had a really, really good time, and there’s a lot of memories that maybe I shouldn’t repeat here.

So that’s the 35th Anniversary Gala that we had last weekend [May 14, 2016]. We had Ms. Laura Ingraham who is a Dartmouth ‘84, she gave the keynote address. We had a really high turnout, over about 130 people there, including about 100 alums from the Dartmouth Review and students and a few other people who were just big fans of the Review and the influence it’s had on the nation and on the conservative, intellectual movement across college campuses.

Collector’s Comments: The sequence of events for each Gala is published in an anniversary issue of the Review. As Brandon mentioned, the details of the occurrences at each Gala are not privy to the public and cannot be revealed.

Bestiality Society

Title: Bestiality Society

Informant Info: Sandor Farkas is the Editor-in-Chief of The Dartmouth Review. He is a ’17 from Haydenville, MA. He was interviewed on May 24, 2016 at the Review office in Hanover, NH.

Type of Lore: Verbal, Legend

Country of Origin: United States

Social / Cultural Context: The Review was known for more provocative and somewhat absurd stunts in the 1980s. The effort to establish a bestiality society as a joke is one of them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nVFbeEdiNA&feature=youtu.be

Transcript:

Yeah, so I won’t name any names, they’re not public, but a group of students who you could say considered themselves perplexed at the Council on Student Organizations recent decision to approve the creation of a gay student group, this group of Reviewers decided it was weird to have a student group funded by the college dedicated to a particular sexuality, so they took another sexual orientation, that of humans towards animals, and they determined to create an official Dartmouth student group dedicated to the exploration of this human-animal connection, known commonly as bestiality. So what they did, is they took the gay student union’s proposal to the Council on Student Organizations, and they simply replaced every mention of the word “homosexuality” with “bestiality” but they didn’t end there. They actually went and researched bestiality, did, you know, looked at the scientific research on it, looked at research written about it, and they created a whole curriculum for what this student organization would do when it would meet, you know, officers, budget, they did everything, and they even found an advisor, a very old professor, well-known, respected, who had been involved in the Review for some time, in fact since its creation, and that professor became their adviser, and so this group of a few students, a couple women, a couple men, pretty diverse group actually, and this old professor walks into the Council on Student Organizations, the COSO hearing, and the professor is actually carrying a little stuffed animal tiger in his hand, and they make the presentation all the while the professor is petting slowly the tiger, like this, and uh, they make the proposal very heartfelt, the Council on Student Organizations keep a straight face the entire time, and at one incident, one of the students, who is Indian, actually says “where I come from, we have very deep connection with animals like elephants and tigers,” you know, deep connection, wink wink, so they leave the room, there is a deliberation for ten, fifteen minutes, and they come back in, it’s announced to them that they, that COSO decided to NOT fund the group by a, I think it was five, no, four-two decision, and immediately, one of the students in the group, female students, “One vote!  We lost by one vote!” and just goes hysterical and everyone in the group just went hysterical, and that is how a bunch of Reviewers trolled, you could say, what we could “trolled,” the Council on Student Organizations.

Collector’s Comments: This legend is perhaps one of the lesser known exploits of the Review, not having been revealed in the past. Even many Review staff members do not know of it. It is henceforth accessible to the public.