Works Cited

“a Slave Auction Described by Russell.” The New England Farmer; a Monthly Journal (1848-1871), vol. 13, no. 7, 1861, pp. 342.

Alexander, M. J. “Not just (any) Body can be a Citizen: The Politics of Law, Sexuality and Postcoloniality in Trinidad and Tobago and the Bahamas.” Feminist Review, no. 48, 1994, pp. 11.

Agostinho, Daniela. “Ghosting and Ghostbusting Feminism.” Graduate Journal for the Study of Culture 6 (2016): 1-16. Print.

Benjamin, Rich. “Get Out and the Death of White Racial Innocence.” The New Yorker. 21 Mar. 2017. 27 May 2017. <http://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/get-out-and-the-death-of-white-racial-innocence>.

Bernstein, Elizabeth. “Militarized humanitarianism meets carceral feminism: The politics of sex, rights, and freedom in contemporary antitrafficking campaigns.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 36, no. 1 (2010): 45-71.

“Chattel Slavery.” Fight Slavery Now! N.p., 14 Dec. 2015. Web. 31 May 2017.

Chew, Huibin Amelia. “What’s Left? After ‘Imperialist Feminist’ Hijackings.” Feminism and War: Confronting US Imperialism. Ed. Robin L. Riley, Chandra Talpade Mohanty, and Minnie Bruce Pratt. New York: Zed, 2008. 75-90.

Complex, Valerie. “Will It Get Better For Black People In the Horror Genre?” Black Girl Nerds. 31 July 2015. Web. 11 Apr. 2015.

Cruz, Lenika. “In Get Out, the Eyes Have It.” The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 03 Mar. 2017. Web. 28 May 2017. <https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/03/in-get-out-the-eyes-have-it/518370/>.

Desta, Yohana. “Jordan Peele’s Get Out Almost had an Impossibly Bleak Ending.” Vanity Fair, 03 Marc. 2017. Web. 39 May 2017. <http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/03/jordan-peele-get-out-ending>.

Doesticks, Q. K. P. What Became of the Slaves on a Georgia Plantation? Great Auction Sale of Slaves, at Savannah, Georgia, March 2d & 3d, 1859. A Sequel to Mrs. Kemble’s Journal. , 1863.

Ellison, Treva. “The Strangeness of Progress” from Johnson, E. Patrick, ed. No Tea, No Shade: New Writings in Black Queer Studies. Duke University Press, 2016. and “The Disorder of Law and Order” http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2930-the-disorder-of-law-and-order-free-bresha-meadows (Links to an external site.)

Gutiérrez, Gabriel. “Black Culture Is Cool, So Why Aren’t Black People?” Medium. N.p., 10 June 2015. Web. 28 May 2017. <https://medium.com/hey-guys-lets-talk-about-cool-stuff-swag/black-culture-is-cool-so-why-aren-t-black-people-1929d6e7bcc2>.

Guy-Sheftall, Beverly.  2002. “The Body Politic:  Black Female Sexuality and the 19th C. Euro-American Imagination,” in Skin Deep, Spirit Strong: The Black Female Body in American Culture, edited by Kimberly Gisele Wallace-Sanders. Ann Arbor:  University of Michigan Press, pp:  14.

Hancock, Ange-Marie. ““We Are Named by Others and We Are Named by Ourselves”.” Intersectionality (2016): 161-91. Print.

Harris, Tamara Winfrey. “All Hail the Queen?” Bitch Media. N.p., 20 May 2013. Web. 28 May 2017. <https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/all-hail-the-queen-beyonce-feminism>.

History.com Staff. “Slavery in America.” History.com. A&E Television Networks, 2009. Web. 31 May 2017.

Hutson, Matthew. “Whites See Blacks as Superhuman.” Slate Magazine, 14 Nov. 2014. Web. 28 May 2017. <http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/11/whites_see_black s_as_superhuman_strength_speed_pain_tolerance_and_the_magical.html>.

Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman. “Animal: New Directions in the Theorization of Race and Posthumanism.” Feminist Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, 2013, pp. 669–685. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23719431.

Lennon, Kathleen, “Feminist Perspectives on the Body”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/feminist-body/>.

Lewis, Ethan. “The ABCs of Horror Tropes.” Den of Geek. 26 Apr. 2013. Web. 11 Apr. 2016.

Means Coleman, Robin R. Horror Noire: Blacks in American Horror Films from the 1890s to Present. New York: Routledge, 2011. Web. 11 Apr. 2016.

Meyer, Robinson. “The Courage of Bystanders Who Press ‘Record.'” The Atlantic. 08 Apr. 2015. 27 May 2017. <https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/04/the-courage-of-bystanders-who-press-record/389979/>.

Moses, Joy. “‘Get Out’: What Black America Knows About The Sunken Place.” The Huffington Post, 12 Mar. 2017. Web. 28 May 2017. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/get-out-what-black-america-knows-about-the-sunken_us_58c199f8e4b0c3276fb7824a>.

Preciado, Paul Beatriz “Feminism Beyond Humanity, Ecology beyond the Environment” – http://autonomies.org/it/2015/07/paul-beatriz-preciado-feminism-beyond-humanism-ecology-beyond-the-environment/

Roberts, Dorothy E. “The Politics of Race and Science: Conservative Colorblindness and the Limits of Liberal Critique.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 12, no. 01 (2015): 199-211

Sandbeck, Sune. “Towards an Understanding of Carceral Feminism as Neoliberal Biopower.” In Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Alberta. Retrieved from http://www. cpsa-acsp. ca/papers2012/Sandbeck. pdf. 2012.

da Silva, Denise Ferreira. “No-Bodies.” Griffith Law Review 18.2 (2009): 212-36. Print.

Smith, Ariel. “Indigenous Cinema and the Horrific Reality of Colonial Violence.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society. 13 Feb. 2015. Web. 11 Apr. 2016.

Slavery

Image

One consistent theme throughout the film is it’s allusions to American slavery in both overt and obscure ways. Some scenes evoke the submissive relationship of a servant to their master, while others illuminate the insidious ways in which slavery has informed U.S. race relations, as well as the expansion, proliferation and dexterity of heteropatriarchy. While not comprehensive, below are a few key moments in which allusions to slave time were particularly striking:

Scene #1: The sizing up of the Chris’ physicality when the family first sits down to dinner:

Jeremy: Because with your frame and your genetic makeup … if you really pushed your

body … And I mean really train. No pussyfooting around. You’d be a fucking beast.

Missy: What have I missed?
Rose: A whole bunch of nothing. – We just talking about sports.

Scene #2: … And when he is introduced in the ‘party’ hosted by the Amitage’s

Neighbor #1: Oh, How handsome is he? … Not bad, huh Nelson? So, is

it true? Is it better?

Neighbor #2: Fair skin has been in favor for the past what, couple of hundreds of years…
But now the pendulum has swung back. Black is in fashion.

Scene #3: Most notably, the auction, which is when the audience first discovers that the party is really a silent auction for Chris’ body

Dean: How about sparklers and bingo?

Scene #4: When the mission of the The Order of the Coagula is explained

Roman: You have been chosen because of the physical advantages you enjoyed your entire lifetime. With your natural gifts and our determination we could both be part of something greater. Something perfect.

Scene #5: When the mission of the The Order of the Coagula is explained (continued)

Rod: They’re probably abducting black people, brainwashing them and making them Slaves… or sex slaves, not just regular slaves, but sex slaves and shit. See I don’t know if it’s the hypnosis that’s making them slaves or whatnot…but all I know is they already got two brothers we know and they could be a whole bunch of brothers they got already.

Scene #6: When the mission of the The Order of the Coagula is explained (continued)

Jim Hudson: A sliver of you will still be in there somewhere. Limited consciousness. You’ll be able to see and hear … What your body is doing, but your existence will be as a passenger. An audience. You will live in …

Chris: The Sunken Place.

___

Throughout the course of this movie, and especially in the above scenes, we learn that the relationship between Rose and Chris is not the romance it first appeared. Chris is not Rose’s first ‘Black boyfriend’ as she claimed. Scrolling through the list of latest NBA drafts, we learn that Rose exclusively targets black men. Wrapped up in the her rationale for that target pool are assumptions about black men’s physicality – their youth, athleticism, able-bodiedness, muscularity, health, virility, etc. She has a type in the truest sense of the word. The Armitage experiment is predicated on their full subscription to the stereotypes of Black men. More subtle however lies assumptions about their mental fortitude, or lack thereof. Rose is situated within the Armitage family tradition, the conception of the Order of the Coagula by patriarch Roman Armitage. This secret evil cult promises white people a new [black] body to host their conscious and prolong their existence on Earth. In order for mission to be constructed as a morally sound and justifiable endeavor, Blackness has to be cast in the certain light, and both the black body and mind has to be divested of many of the attributes that equate it with all the humanity, value, and competence of those of a white person’s. The following analysis will draw from the United States’ history of slavery while utilizing feminist theory to unmask some of these assumptions.

Dean Armitage presides over the auction and he’s nothing like the easy going, forgivably ignorant character that we are first presented with in the beginning of the movie. Dean proposes a casual game of Bingo and initially, this appears to be fitting with his character (it’s worth mentioning that Bingo is an American pastime commonly associated with elderly white people). Throughout this entirely silent scene however, we see Dean for who he really is – a cold, decisive, mastermind, a perpetrator of an insidious with even more sinister underpinnings. As the camera zooms out from Dean’s face to his hands to his body, and finally captures the entire pavilion, a golden-framed picture of Chris is revealed to the audience, and here the plot unfolds.

The hand gestures, the winning Bingo cards, the clapping when Jim Hudson appears to make the highest bid and win, all make this scene ostentatiously reminiscent of a slave auction. In similar fashion, slaves were property, merchandise, and were handled as such. They could be “sold, traded or inherited … abused, branded, bred, exploited or killed” (History.com, 2009). In the tradition of chattel slavery, slaves  maintain their slave status for a lifetime, and any children born to them are also relegated to slave status. Why did Black bodies make good slaves? “In the early 17th century, European settlers in North America turned to African slaves as a cheaper, more plentiful labor source than indentured servants (who were mostly poorer Europeans)”(“Chattel Slavery.”, 2015). Slavery because a hugely economical practice and thus, slave owners devised a method to control and assert the power they created for themselves over slaves. Black bodies, and particularly black male bodies, were essentially machines for production.

Feminist theorists Judith Butler, Ferreira da Silva, Roderick Ferguson, Sojourner Truth, and many many more, place heavy emphasis on conceptualizations of the body in feminist theory. Therefore, to understand the nuances of micro- and macro-level aggressions Chris experiences throughout the entirety of Get Out, we first turn way back in time to American slavery to contextualize the Black body in its initial stages of existence in the United States.

Black bodies subverted conventional European understandings of beauty, decorum, cognition and sanctity. Therefore, there was no conception of black bodies as unequivocally human.  “There is nothing sacred about Black … bodies … they are not off-limits, untouchable, or unseeable” (Guy-Sheftall, 2002). There were, and still are today, constant placed in close proximity to ape-like savages, and drawn as the inferior antithesis of the refined, civil, European man. And so the process begins. Europeans start out by construing conditions of black bodies as unnatural, exotic, inhuman, and then through chattel slavery, recreating the very conditions that cripple black bodies mentally, physically, and emotionally. As explained by Frederick Douglass, African American slave turned freedman,  “My natural elasticity was crushed, my intellect languished, the disposition to read departed, the cheerful spark that lingered about my eye died; the dark night of slavery closed in upon me; and behold a man transformed into a brute!”

As less than human, black bodies become the subject of all manner of tests to extract their monetary value and utility. Described below is the sentiment of a [White] man present at a slave auction.

“He was a muscular fellow, broad-shouldered, narrow-flanked, but rather small in stature ;. he had on a broad, greasy, old wideawake, a blue jacket, a coarse cotton shirt, loose and rather ragged trousers and broken shoes. The expression of his face was heavy and sad, but it was by no means disagreeable, in spite of his thick lips, broad nostrils and high cheek bones. On his bead ·was wool instead of hair; his whiskers were little flacculent, black tufts, and his skin was as dark as that of the late Mr. Dyce Sombre or of Sir Jung Bahadoor himself. I am neither sentimentalist, nor Black Republican, nor negro· worshipper, but I confess the sight caused a strange thrill through my heart tried in vain to make myself familiar with the fact that I could, for the sum of nine hundred and seventy-five dollars become as absolutely the owner of that mass of blood, bones, sinews, flesh and brains, as of the horse which stood by my side” (“a Slave Auction Described by Russell.”, 1861).

Another testament goes further to describe the measures of evaluation for black bodies in preparation for slave auctions.

“…The negroes were examined with as little consideration as if they had been brutes indeed; the buyers pulling their mouths open to see their teeth, pinching their limbs to find how muscular they were, walking them up and down to detect any signs of lameness, making them stoop and bend in different ways that they might be certain there was no concealed rupture or wound; and in addition to all this treatment, asking them scores of questions relative to their qualifications and accomplishments..”(Doesticks, 1859).

“Colonial rule simultaneously involved racializing and sexualizing the population, which also meant naturalizing whiteness” (Alexander, 1994). Creating such distance between Black bodies, humanity and citizenship served to “ease white male guilt about the enslavement and oppression of Africans…” during times of slavery, and we see exactly the same notions operating in full effect in Get Out (Guy-Sheftall, 2002). Black bodies, the economic pivot of slave-plantation economy, were sexualized (Alexander, 1994) – Particular focus on black genitalia “reinforced the European connection between lasciviousness, sexuality, and animal passion among Africans in general…”(Guy-Sheftall, 2002). As in times of slavery, we see the neighbors take liberties with Chris’ body that I’d argue White people surely wouldn’t dare to take with other white people (Scenes 2 and 3 above). The script certainly alludes to it, but on scene he is poked, prodded and felt up. Having just been introduced to Chris, one woman even dares to ask Rose about their sex life and Chris’ genitalia. In these scenes, Peele is drawing from a long history with regards to black bodies.

 

slave auction, virginia, 1861, black history, slave trade

Cotton Chair

Chris bound in the cotton chair

When Chris is tied up in the Armitage’s basement, he pulls out the cotton stuffing from the armchair he is strapped into and uses it as an ear plug to keep him from falling under hypnosis. Initially, we connect Chris’ original trauma (when he allowed his mother to die in a hit and run while he sat at home and watched tv) to his ability to get free. We see in the many flashbacks to his mother’s death that Chris is largely paralyzed–except for a frantic clawing at the bedposts. Flash-forwarding to Chris’ restraint in the basement after being tied down at the basement by the leather binds, the hypnosis backfires, as the saving grace of being hypnotized is that it sends him back into the moment if his mother’s death, which is what forces his hands to frantically claw–this time at the leather chair, revealing the cotton underneath. In resisting the family’s hypnosis, Chris picks and stuffs cotton into his ears, a racial irony that touches on the notable role that cotton picking played in the enslavement of black people. As Chris’ arms and feet are bound, much like slaves were shackled, this imagery of literally picking cotton to drown out the noise of the oppressor subverts this historical trope and is how Chris manages to survive.

Cotton fields on an American plantation

Chris’s hands in the cotton chair

“This might be the only time where a Black man picking cotton has been a lifesaving task.”

The phrase used to describe American economy in the 1830’s and 1840’s was “cotton is king.” It became the first mass consumer commodity and its production turned millions of black human beings themselves into commodities, particularly in Southern United States.

https://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/files/2013/01/100facts_cottonking.jpg

Black slaves processing cotton on an American plantation

The connection to cotton picking gives the movie a much deeper historical and racial relevance that ties the experience of African Americans to Chris. The deeply-embedded trauma of being the descendants of slaves is inherent in all African Americans. That it is what ultimately comes to save Chris’ life is an allegory that many African Americans can appreciate as they struggle with present-day conditions. Perhaps this might be Keele’s way of suggesting that white people cannot keep African Americans trapped in their historical trauma and that it is the very fact of that trauma that will ultimately liberate descendants of this traumatic history. Thus, plugging his ears with the cotton becomes symbolic of how the memory of past enslavement becomes protection against re-enslavement.

Connections to the Readings

In tying these to a contemporary framework, Zakiyyah Iman Jackson’s “Animal: New Directions in the Theorization of Race and Posthumanism” narrates a turn in critical theory towards the animal. Her intervention and iterations of animal studies and posthumanism aim to address how the fields of animal studies and posthumanism would be altered if the work and activism of people thinking about race and racism circumscribed the boundaries between human and animals within a posthumanist framework. To that, she articulates how we risk denying people’s humanity and how by ignoring history and centuries of colonization, we risk perpetuating this notion. In other words, ignoring the histories of slavery, colonialism, and racialization and how these play into the human, re-run into the risk of replicating the same violent epistemological assumptions that feminism is supposed to work against. While the goal of posthumanism is to decentralize the human so that we get a sense of how we are all connected, it can be harmful because it ignores how colonialism and slavery never gave the chance to some groups of people to be humans themselves.

Thus to ignore colonialism, slavery, and imperialism, as white characters in the film attempt to do, would mean blinding ourselves to the heteronormativity that underpins our legal system and most other aspects of our lives. Jackson articulates that the idea to move beyond the “human” comes from a place of privilege (a luxury that only white people have because their humanity is already acknowledged due to the Eurocentric historic domination of the world) while minorities are seen as irrational (therefore less than human) and their history of slavery, colonialism, imperialism, and conquest is erased by post-humanism. In subverting the trope of cotton picking and the symbolism it serves in present-day, Keele confronts this erasure and brings to the forefront the legacy of slavery and imperialism that continue to manifest in present-day and inform the day-to-day experiences of black people in modern-day America. In teasing out this parallel, the film links the ubiquitous trauma of both past and modern-day enslavement to essentially push against the idea of a ‘postracial America.’

Black Buck

A Black Buck

The symbol of the deer is present throughout the film, beginning with Rose hitting one that was crossing the road in one of the first scenes in the film, sending it to its death. In this scene, we see a police officer arriving at the scene, requesting to see Chris’ ID without cause. It is evidently white privilege in a situation that has seen black people shot to death. However, as we see unravel the rest of the film, we see how the deer becomes symbolic in its connection to the recurring theme of abandonment. After the deer is hit, close-ups are intercut with shots of Chris’ transfixed face, hinting at something potentially more significant than merely the deer’s death. Later, during his first trip to the “Sunken Place,” Chris reveals his greatest childhood shame to Rose’s hypnotherapist mother, Missy–that he didn’t act quickly enough to save his own mother in the hours after her hit-and-run accident, and thus felt responsible for her death. Chris suffers from this childhood trauma of his mother’s death, feeling that had he called 911 when she didn’t return home instead of watching TV all night, she could have been saved. Immediately after Rose hits the deer, he gets out of the car to check on it because it reminds him of his mother’s death. (We see the theme of abandonment reemerge as he is finally escaping from the Armitage home when after he accidentally hits Georgina with his car, he stops to pick her up despite her body being inhabited by Rose’s grandmother, because he sees the parallels to his mother).

Chris looking at the black buck

Chris as a child in his bedroom

However, the deer serves as an important motif in Get Out in other instrumental ways. Deer are also known as “bucks,” a term used to sometimes represent Black men. The deer killed by Rose at the beginning of the film foreshadows the fact that Chris in danger set to meet his end.

Dean and Missy Armitage

The deer offers commentary about race and resistance in other ways. The biggest indicator that the deer means something more is most apparent when Chris first meets Rose’s father, Dean. His reaction to the deer story is notably odd. He praises Rose for hitting the deer and goes on to rant about the entire species and how they ruin the local neighborhoods, thus according to him, eradicating them would be of great service to the community. This scene not only sets an odd tone for the rest of Chris’ interactions with the family, but it also prepares the audience for what is yet to come. The deer serves as a motif for black men, in representing how they are perceived to ruin neighborhoods, how unassimilated they are and how they need to be locked up (or worse) for everyone’s safety.

Later in the film, it is revealed that the Armitage family has been appropriating black bodies for the convenience and use of wealthy white society, and this is justified as being for the greater good or, in other words, as a service to the community. Dean’s out-of-place tangent earlier in the film, then, is not just referring to the deer, but what — or whom — it represents to him in the form of black bodies.

A buck on the walls of the Armitage home

At first, it seems peculiar that Dean speaks so lowly of deer, considering he has the imposing head of one mounted on the wall of the recreation room where Chris is later held against his will. It is not just a deer head mounted to the wall, either; the antlers indicate that the deer is likely male, also known as a buck. Again, historically, the “black buck” was a racist slur in post-Reconstruction America for black men who refused to bow to white authority and lusted after white women. However, that in itself is not enough to make one pause, since it was clear early on that Dean was a hunter, and procured many exotic souvenirs during his travels abroad. During the grand tour of the house, he casually showed off his trophies from far-off African locales, including statues, instruments, and tapestries. All of these many elements he had cherry-picked to display in his own come came from black culture representing the pursuit of black appropriation. Like the black people Rose hunted and seduced, Dean’s favorite bits of blackness were given new life as decorative trophies. The biggest trophy of all is displayed in the recreation room. To the Armitages, Chris and the deer are mirror images of each other. The Black men and women Rose has dated were hunted and immortalized as trophies, just like the deer hanging on the wall in the room Chris is being held captive.

Later, it is no mistake that Chris escapes the recreation room the way he does. He resists the family’s hypnosis cues by picking and stuffing cotton (from the armrests on his chair) into his ears. After Rose’s brother, Jeremy, comes to collect Chris and Chris strikes him, he finds his way to the operation room where he strikes a shocked Dean with the antlers of the very buck that loomed over him moments ago. The antlers are both a literal and a metaphorical implement of resistance, and their indication is clear: Chris is not a wild beast to be tamed, and he will not be yet another ‘ethnic’ trophy for the Armitage estate. With the prior knowledge of Dean’s awkward raving about the deer population needing to be kept under control, it becomes especially emblematic that a physical token of the dehumanization of black people becomes a tool for subduing him down and, by extension, the nuanced oppression that he represents.

The imagery in Get Out is saturated with the imagery with subtextual power, using the deer as a symbol for Chris’ past trauma, the animalization and appropriation of people of color, forced deference to the white man and, finally, as an instrument of defiance.