Rose: The Relationship

Chris and Rose

Chris: Do they know… Do they know I’m black?
Rose: No.
Chris: Should they? It seems like… something you might want to know… mention.
Rose: Mom and Dad, my uh, my black boyfriend will be coming up this weekend… and I just don’t want you to be shocked because he’s a black man.
Chris: You said I was the first black guy you ever dated?
Rose: Yeah, so what?
Chris: Yeah, so this is uncharted territory for them. You know I don’t want to be chased off the lawn with a shotgun.
Rose: You’re not going to. First of all, my dad would have voted for Obama a third time if he could have. Like, the love is so real… They are not racist. I would have told you. I wouldn’t be bringing you home to them.

Rose is innocent. No matter what. Or, at least, that’s how she sees it. Again and again, in every scene she is in, Rose casts herself in the light of the innocent, good, pure-hearted white woman. She is the white woman who is progressive, because she is dating her first-ever (!) black man, she is the white woman who is brave, because she stands up for him in front of a cop, and she is the white woman who is good and pure because she is white and female, even when she finally unmasks herself with “You know I can’t give you those keys, right, babe?”

Rose’s conversations with her boyfriend-slash-victim Chris are carefully chosen words that show how innocent a person Rose sees herself as. Her actions do not speak louder than her words because her actions are almost entirely passive. In every case, Rose does not really act aggressively, but it is that absence of thought that show the white woman privilege Rose capitalizes on. We can see this through analyzing several of her conversations with Chris.

In the introductory scene above, Rose casts herself as the woman who comes from a progressive background, who loves her black boyfriend, and who has not fallen prey to the beauty standards of white-driven media, because she has a black boyfriend. In mocking Chris’s concerns over her white family’s racism, Rose plays the aware girlfriend who understands race relations that she is not on the receiving end of. As a white woman, she is not threatened by racism, and as a white woman, she cannot see how she—innocent and nonthreatening—can be a member of a community who would oppress people of color. “They are not racist. I would have told you. I wouldn’t be bringing you home to them.” Rose believes she understands the black experience, and she casts herself in the dominant role in the relationship as the protector of the black man.

Rose confronting the policeman

Police: Sir, can I see your license, please?

Rose: Wait, why?

Chris: Yeah, I have a state ID.

Rose: No, no, no. He wasn’t driving.

Police: I didn’t ask who was driving. I asked to see his ID.

Rose: Yeah, why? That doesn’t make any sense.

Chris: Here.

Rose: No, no, no. Fuck that. You don’t have to give him your ID because you haven’t done anything wrong.

Chris: Baby, baby, it’s okay. Come on.

Police: Anytime there is an incident we have every right to ask…

Rose: That’s bullshit.

Rose’s role as the innocent, progressive protector of the black man continues in the above dialogue. After Rose hits a deer in her car, a policeman comes and Rose finds an opportunity to push forward her innocent yet aware warrior agenda. She appears to stand up for Chris, using her awareness of her white privilege—and her awareness of her automatically innocent status as a white woman—to protect Chris from the policeman. However, by inserting herself into the situation, she could have escalated it. Her role is not to protect him, it is to progress the image she has of herself. If she can convince herself she understands the relationship between Chris and the white policeman, she can absolve herself of racism, which is what she is most terrified of. Her second agenda in not allowing the police officer to see Chris’s ID is not immediately apparent. If the officer sees his ID, he will have a paper trail of proof that Rose and Chris were together immediately before Chris goes missing, which undermines her alternative agenda.

Rose and Chris

Chris: I mean, how are they different from that cop?

Rose: I don’t like being wrong.

Chris: I’ve noticed that.

Rose: I am sorry.

Chris: No, no, no. Wait, come here.

Rose: Sorry. This sucks.

Chris: What? Why do you say you’re sorry?

Rose: Because I brought you here and I’m related to all of them.

Blaming yourself is a classic, well-known, and generally considered rather irritating and insincere way of absolving yourself of the blame. Rose realizes that her family is not as “not racist” as she would like to think they are—and by extension, herself. By blaming herself, Rose is forcing Chris to say that she is not guilty, that she is different, that she is the young, attractive, desirable white woman who does not hold the blame for racism because she, too, is a victim of the patriarchy. Rose is desperate in this scene to be absolved of any guilt, and in doing so, she again forces Chris to cast her as the progressive, innocent white woman.

Chris: Rose, give me those keys. Give me those keys! Rose, now, now! The keys!

Jeremy: Whoa, be careful, bro.

 

Chris: Where are those keys, Rose?

Rose: You know I can’t give you the keys, right, babe?

As Chris is desperately trying to get out of the Armitage’s house with the family blocking him and supposedly with only Rose on his side, Rose suddenly turns on him. The way she does it, however, is so unlike everybody else. Missy’s hypnotism is innately sinister and terrifyingly controlling. She is the slave driver—literally—who controls her slaves through the essence of elitism and colonialism: a china tea cup. Dean’s re-enactment of a slave auction while his daughter and Chris take a walk in the woods has long since betrayed his own blatantly racist motives. Jeremy’s brandishing of the lacrosse stick (a game often associated with upper-class white privilege, particularly on the East Coast) casts him as the violent racist. And while Chris gets more and more agitated and starts getting angry with Rose because of his frustration and fear, Rose begins to act pitiful. She is not the warrior protectress, but the innocent white woman being yelled at by her black boyfriend who cannot possibly be on the bad side. And it is in this mix of the Armitage’s violence against Chris and Chris’s anger and frustration that Rose simultaneously blames Chris for her “switch” and excuses herself from it. Her statement is incredibly patronizing, emphasizing the white privilege that she pretends to not want. It is the same sentence that might be said to a drunk boyfriend who promises that he can drive home; it is the sentence that says “I know what is best for you,” and laughs at the drunk boyfriend for thinking he has any say in the matter. She calls him “babe” to recall her relationship to him and to emphasize her power over him and manipulation of him. While everybody else is brandishing a lacrosse stick or a cup of tea and running around, Rose’s calm presence stands out as the most dangerous of all.

Rose drinking milk and eating Froot Loops

In a scene with no dialogue, Rose sips on a white cup of milk while eating a separate cup of colored cereal. The symbolism here is obvious, but what is equally as jarring is the transition from the previous scene to now. In the previous scene, Chris fights Missy off brutally. He has the obvious physical advantage but with her teacup, he has no chance against her. Yet, he wins, and he is panting, dark, and sweating after his violent fight. Contrast that with the slicked-back, white-clothed Rose, calmly sitting in her childhood bedroom. While he is fighting for his life, she has already forgotten about him as she sits searching for her next boyfriend. While their relationship is tightly woven for him, with her effects long-lasting and devastating to him, she is calm and problem-free. She has cut her ties, but he is unable to cut his. By removing herself from the situation and through using her earbuds, Rose retains her innocence of the terrible acts and desperate fight going on downstairs. She is the blissfully innocent white woman, even when proven guilty. Additionally, as she searches for potential boyfriends, she sits confidently in her knowledge that as the white woman, she is attractive. She is the white female lure that black men cannot resist, and who will be able to snatch them from their lives, families, and friends with little difficulty, because she is beautiful, innocent, and most importantly: white.

Chris leaning over Rose as the police car pulls up

In the final scene, as the police car rolls up, Rose gleefully takes advantage of her white womanhood to place herself as the innocent victim of the whole scene. With the police lights flashing, Rose knows that the police have seen Chris kneeling over her, threatening her with apparently no violence on her part, and she reaches out to them: “Help…” Chris knows that she has won, too. He stands up, he puts his hands up, and he is desperately resigned to his unfair, racialized and gendered fate at the hands of the beautifully innocent white woman. Although in the end, Chris is rescued by his best friend, this moment could have so easily remained the well-known trope of the innocent white woman brutalized by the wild black man, successfully cast, directed, and acted by Rose’s white womanhood.

Connection to Readings

“We must face the dominant US ideology: that our culture represents the epitome of women’s liberation. Gendered oppression is largely considered irrelevant to women in the USA — a blight instead reserved for people in other countries.” – Huibin Chew, Feminism and War: Confronting US Imperialism

Rose is constantly insinuating that she represents the epitome of a not-racist woman. She believes that she always has the better understanding of interracial relationships than Chris does and that she is able to make the better choices for him because she lives in what she believes to be a post-racial society. Additionally, although she is masterfully using the image of the innocent white woman, Rose seems unaware that her self-representation is a reflection of the patriarchy’s view of white women as a group of lesser people that must be protected, particularly from black men.

Isolated Location

The Armitage House

A lot horror films begin with a peaceful, ideal, happy group of white people planning a visit to a remote location. That could be a cabin in the woods, an abandoned house, a distant sorority, etc. While those could also be imagined destinations that people of color would be fearful in under the right circumstances, there are more realistic locations that actually exist and cause real fear and pain for people of color. There is also the logic that is lacking with those imagined locations and remaining there which, Peele, wanted to avoid, as we would be expecting our black hero to not remain in a house/situation such as a haunted house or a cabin in the woods where a mass murdered is lurking.

One realistically scary remote location that black people have a cause to dear is a plantation inhabited by white people with no neighbors nearby, and especially no black people nearby. Armitage’s house is this remote location. It even has black slaves, that are acting odd or scared, on its properties.

This fear is a realistic fear based on historical precedent. There is a history of violence against black bodies associated with plantation-like houses and, for Chris, living in such a house run by a white family that tries very hard to appear not racist (and which he is trying to impress since he is dating their daughter), far away from anyone, and the only black people around him appearing hostile, is a stressful and terrifying situation.

 

Losing Control

Dean Armitage preparing for surgery

A very common horror trope is the trope of losing control. This has been done through a variety of things including mind control, curses, ghost or demon possessions. In Get Out the trope is there to create social commentary.

The Armitages employ racist science to excuse their taking control of black people’s bodies.They hunt down and trap black people because of their fetishization of the black body. They and their white clientele believe that while black bodies might be superior, it is because black people are animalistic in nature. That means that they are less than human with animal like brains. To them, that is enough of a justification for their actions. They are removing the “inferior” black brain, leaving just enough for the person to still be conscious in everything they experience, and replacing it with the “superior” white brain, basically enslaving those black people. This enslavement is the real source of horror, the real life example of loss of control that back people are afraid of becoming true once more. The Armitages would agree that slavery was horrendous and claim that they are not racists, being oblivious to how their actions are recreating a new scientific slavery and their choosing black people for their perceived advantages is racist.

The Armitages use science as an excuse to be racists. They believe that race is genetic is because of science saying that we evolved from lesser animals to be the dominant top animal now. The Armitages think that white people are the top animal and black people the bottom animal, so white people have a right in re-enslaving them and using the “resources” black people have to offer, namely their bodies. They are not racist: it’s just science. The painter uses similar “colorblind” racist science by claiming that he does not care for Chris’ skin, only his skills, and employing the brain surgery which promises to undue the issue of race by making black people the puppets of white people who will make them act “white” like they are supposed to act. They all forget, however, that race does not come from genetics but it actually comes from racism. Race comes from practice and exploitation of group-differentiated vulnerability and premature death.

Inspiration taken by Dorothy Roberts and Denise de Silva. Roberts best discusses this phenomenon of racist science in “The Politics of Race and Science: Conservative Colorblindness and the Limits of Liberal Critique.” De Silva best discusses the concept of othering and fetishizing the black body in “No-bodies: Law, raciality and violence.”

Death of an Innocent

Buck Being Run Over

Many, if not all, horror films begin with the death of an innocent, whether animal or human, to set the tone of the movie, to hint to the future by acting as a parallel to our hero (who is also an innocent), and to function as a warning to the main character.

In one of the first scenes of Get Out, we see a deer jump in front of Rose’s car, causing a car accident, and it inevitably dies in the woods. Chris, hearing the dying cries of the deer, goes to it and sees it die in front of him. The image of the dying deer haunts Chris right after the accident, reminding him of his mother’s death and his failure to save her. As seen in the movie trailer, this image continues to haunt him in his dreams and while he enters the sunken place. So the deer acts as a warning to Chris (it is running away from something), a reminder (of his mother’s death and his guilt), and a parallel (of innocent deaths occurring in the pathway of a white woman).

Inspiration for this post was drawn from Paul Beatriz Preciado. Preciado discusses the concept of animalization and the difference between human and animal in an interview titled ““Feminism Beyond Humanity, Ecology beyond the Environment.”

Loss of Communication

Chris’s Dead Phone

A horror film without some sort of failure of technology leading to a loss of communication doesn’t exist. Technology, specifically phones, is what keep us connected to each other, it is what offers us a multitude of knowledge at our fingertips within seconds, and it is what makes help be no further than a phone call away. Taking away someone’s phone takes away their connections and their ability to reach out to anyone at a moment’s notice. Being in a scary situation with a phone offers the hero a possible way out. That’s why, it is essential for the antagonist or writer to take that ability away from the hero. This is often done through a lack of cell signal.

For Chris, this lack of communication occurs through his cell phone not having enough battery. His cell phone is essential to his survival and entire experience. He uses it, specifically the flash form its camera, to free the other black people enslaved by the Armitage’s and their white friends. He uses it to keep in touch with Rod, so Rod knows that there is something wrong. He uses it to take a picture of Logan with Rod is then able to use, along with other information and technology, to track him down and save him. It literally is what saves his life by allowing Rod to save him and waking up Walter when Walter has him pinned down.

Chris’s single tool in the entire movie is his cell phone. His strength, although continuously described as superior by the Armitages and their friends, is of little help to him against the power of Missy’s hypnotism. So his cell phone is his only source of useful strength, and he is clever enough to use it to his advantage. So it makes sense that the Armitage’s will want to take the phone away from him by draining the battery and not allowing it to recharge by always unplugging it when Chris isn’t there. By taking away his cell phone, the Armitages both take away his single tool and emphasize how easy it is to cut him off from the world with no consequences. They want no evidence of their crimes, no way for Chris to be tracked back to them and their location, no way for him to be connected to the outside world, so they know that limiting Chris’s uses of the cell phone is the way to do that.

The Death of the Mythical, Token Black Character

Rose Chasing Chris off Her Lawn with a Shotgun

Black characters occupy a very specific niche of tropes in Horror. The token black character is present as either the best friend comic relief or as a magical/mythical character that realizes the extent of the danger the main character is in (The Shining) whose death is necessary to further the plot or to cement how dire the situation is. Whichever the role, their death is more than likely and is especially painful as there are so few black characters in Horror to begin with.

In Get Out, these tropes are filled and subverted at the same time.

The main character is black and the only trope he fills is that of the Hero. Rod, his best friend, fills in the above-mentioned tropes but with a twist. He is not aware of the real danger that awaits at the Armitage’s house (mind controlled enslavement) but he does voice concern and worry, in a joking tone, to Chris about the racism he will inevitably face at Rose’s white parents’ house. He does joke, he is comedic, but his comedy is to help Chris be less tense and scared while also validating and acknowledging his fears. His knowledge is not of an imagined horror, but the real fear black people have towards white people and especially fear of the white parents of a white partner in an interracial relationship. Rod does not fit the racist “mythical Negro” trope by being a shaman, a voodoo doctor, or somehow supernatural in his warnings, but by relaying to the audience his and Chris’s real, valid fears.

The tropes are subverted through black characters surviving the film as Heroes while the white people die (a well-deserved death) as villains. When the black characters die, it is heartbreaking, it is outrageous, because they did not deserve to die, but their deaths are not to let the audience and hero know how dire the circumstances are, to create sentimentality, or drive the hero to fight harder (Chris is fighting for escape, for survival, and he only stops to help Georgina because of guilt about his mother’s death and kinship).Their deaths are there to show why Chris was/is afraid of white people, how racism isn’t over, and that for them death was an escape, a better alternative, to a life of enslavement under rich, white people that fetishize their “subhuman/animal” attributes.

The white characters rely on these tropes and the idea that no one will care if a black person has gone missing to torture and enslave black people. Even in this world, as we see through Rod’s interaction with the police, the police, even if black, does not care if a black man has gone missing and won’t take the worries of another black man seriously (they don’t even seem to care about Logan being found and acting out of character). However, in the end, they are wrong about the premise of the movie they are in. This is not a white fantasy/horror about white heroes; it is a horror film about the horrors white people cause with a black hero.

Chris does not die and neither does Rod, the comic relief. They survive. Chis is scared but he survives. They are free and they bring hope with them. Hope for them, for other black people the Armitage’s have enslaved, and for the audience. Peele puts it best in an interview he did with Variety Today:

In the beginning, when I was first making this movie the idea was, ‘Okay, we’re in this post-racial world, apparently.’ That was the whole idea… So the ending in that era was meant to say, ‘Look, you think race isn’t an issue? Well at the end, we all know this is how this movie would end right here… [As time passed] It was very clear that the ending needed to transform into something that gives us a hero, that gives us an escape, gives us a positive feeling when we leave this movie.

White Fears

Armitage Family Bingo and the Prize

As discussed on the home page of “Horror Tropes,” most horror movies have been created with the white imaginary and fear in mind. Horror movies have been asking what does an ideal white life look like, how can we interrupt it, and what are the white fears we can use to interrupt it. That mindset does not leave much room for people of color in horror movies apart from fodder for the violence.

Get Out flips this white focus on its heads in two ways.

First, the movie does not revolve around white fears. The movie focuses on what black people fear. What do white people fear? Demons, werewolves, ghosts, ax murderers, (black people) etc. What do black people fear? White people. Specifically, white people hurting them, killing them, enslaving them, and being powerless to defend themselves against any of that because the white people are using the system (police, the state, laws, etc) to control them. Peele focused on those fears and made them visible, showing that white supremacy and racism still exist and white people have a lot of power over black people in society.

Second, the movie focuses on the white fear of being perceived as racist. The Armitages, violent as they are towards black people, do not want to be perceived as racist. They try to act “normal” and the father, Dean, uses language like “man” to finish his sentences, that he thinks sounds black and would put Chris at ease before he takes away his life. Dean claims that he loves Obama and would have voted for him a third time, something which Rose also mentions to prove that her family isn’t racist. One of the clients claims that Tiger Woods is his favorite golfer and a great guy. A different client claims that being black is now cool. The blind photographer claims to not see or care for color, being colorblind. Rose dismisses Chris’ real fears of meetings her parents as silly because they obviously could not be racist at this age and time. All those actions are supposed to say, “Look at me, I am not racist! I love black people! Racism is dead!” But racism isn’t dead and Peele uses this denial and white fear of being called racist to make the audience aware of that fact. The colorblindness, the microaggressions, the fetishization, the state violence, the actual violence, are all signs that we don’t live in a post-racial society and we never will as long as differences create profit for the state and benefit those in power.

Inspiration for this post came from Zakiyyah Jackson and Treva Ellison. Jackson discusses the concept pf post-humanism, and so the white fear of racism,  and colorblindness in “Animal: New directions in the theorization of race and posthumanism.” discusses carceral feminism and issues of the state and police in “The Strangeness of Progress.”