Aligning Your Assessment Plan
We include several options for assessment plans in the ELI Toolbox on your menu navigation. Here is one from Wiggins and McTighe (2008) that we often use in our faculty development workshops. Complete an assessment plan for your project.
Step 1: Desired Results (Objectives) |
Stage 2: Assessment and Evidence |
|
---|---|---|
If the desired results is for learners to... | Then I need evidence of the students ability to... | So the assessments need to include tasks and evidence like... |
(Undergraduates)
Demonstrate in-depth knowledge in at least one area of the mathematics. |
This is course specific, we will need to elaborate. | |
(Undergraduates)
Communicate mathematical ideas using multiple modalities both formally and informally. |
Verbal and written proficiency in explaining mathematical ideas to others. |
|
(Undergraduates)
Bring diverse mathematical methods to bear on a complex mathematical problem. |
Isolate appropriate techniques for their projects from a library of options.
Evaluate the effectiveness of different methods in different combinations. |
|
(Graduates)
Draw on their mathematical expertise to develop pedagogical components for undergraduate courses. |
Develop project ideas appropriate to the level of the course. | Student and instructor feedback on comparison of different project ideas (whether adopted or not). |
(Graduates)
Mentor students effectively on open-ended projects. |
|
Observational evaluations throughout the course. |
(Graduates)
Demonstrate mastery of core pedagogical design skills. |
Create and refine project ideas (mostly) independently
Design project components that fit into the overall narrative of the course. |
Feedback from course instructors on student participation in project design. |
Assessing Student Artifacts
We have several resources intended to help you to review student artifacts to analyze for student learning. How do you plan to review student evidence?
Donec id elit non mi porta gravida at eget metus. Donec ullamcorper nulla non metus auctor fringilla. Aenean lacinia bibendum nulla sed consectetur. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Cras mattis consectetur purus sit amet fermentum. Etiam porta sem malesuada magna mollis euismod. Aenean lacinia bibendum nulla sed consectetur. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.
Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus. Donec id elit non mi porta gravida at eget metus. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit. Maecenas sed diam eget risus varius blandit sit amet non magna. Vivamus sagittis lacus vel augue laoreet rutrum faucibus dolor auctor.
Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Nullam id dolor id nibh ultricies vehicula ut id elit. Donec id elit non mi porta gravida at eget metus. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2008). Understanding by design. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.